projectmanager-pipx-pypi-cookiecutter
Date: 2025 07-July 01
Clayton 0:
Provide copy to projectmanager-AI-wanderdownthegardenpath
this is a transcript from a project i am hoping will succeed. I want to leveage cookiecutter, pipx, and pypi to roll out project manager classes for python software that I write.
ChatGPT 0:
Great! Based on your transcript and goal — using Cookiecutter, pipx, and PyPI to roll out reusable ProjectManager
classes — you’ve already laid down a clear architecture with thoughtful design decisions. Let me recap where you’re at and what comes next, based on your transcript:
✅ Current Design Summary
1. Modular ProjectManager
-
Central class
ProjectManager
tracks config paths likeexports
,imports
,configs
, etc. -
Configs are loaded from a user-defined or default
.json
file. -
All config values are dynamically bound as attributes.
2. Factory + Controller Architecture
-
ProjectFactory
handles reading config files and returning aProjectManager
. -
ScaffoldController
wraps Cookiecutter to scaffold project directories. -
CLI stays thin and defers logic to the controller (✅ clean separation of concerns).
3. CLI via pipx
-
CLI is built using
argparse
(for now), living incli/main.py
. -
Commands like
init
scaffold a project using Cookiecutter. -
Packaged using
pyproject.toml
with an entry point so it works withpipx
.
🔧 What You’re Building
A system where you can:
-
pipx install projectmanager
-
Run
pmx init --name myproject
to scaffold a standard layout using Cookiecutter -
Import
ProjectManager
in code and use it to locate/validate/manage project files -
(Eventually) extend the CLI with
pmx run
,pmx inspect
,pmx config
, etc.
🔜 Suggested Next Steps
You’re at Step 1 of 4. You’ve said “go go gadget” and are learning how to build this instead of getting copy-paste code. So, here’s what we can work on next together:
📍 Next Task: Template Path Resolution
We want your ScaffoldController
to be able to:
-
Accept either:
-
A template path (user-supplied)
-
A template name (like
"default"
)
-
-
Convert
"default"
into a path likeprojectmanager/templates/default/
that’s bundled with the library
👨🏫 Let’s Design This:
📂 Directory layout:
Assume your PyPI package includes:
projectmanager/
├── templates/
│ └── default/
│ ├── cookiecutter.json
│ └── {{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/
│ ├── configs/
│ ├── exports/
│ └── ...
🧠 Strategy for resolving a template name:
from importlib.resources import files
def resolve_template_path(template: str) -> Path:
if template == "default":
return files("projectmanager.templates.default").joinpath(".").resolve()
return Path(template).resolve()
But: importlib.resources.files()
works for Python 3.9+. If you're using 3.11+, it’s perfect.
Would you like to implement this template resolution function as a method on ScaffoldController
, or as a utility function in utils.py
?
🎯 Then We’ll:
-
Update
ScaffoldController
to use it -
Update
pyproject.toml
to includetemplates/
in the final wheel (include = ["templates/**"]
) -
Test that
pmx init --name test_project
works when installed viapipx
When you're ready, give me the go-ahead to implement template resolution and we’ll continue.
Or, if you want to handle it yourself with a buddy watching your back, I’ll review and help. Just let me know which path you want:
-
“go go gadget resolution function”
-
or “I’ll write it, you review it” 🧠🛠️
Clayton 1:
"All config values are dynamically bound as attributes." What does this mean?
ChatGPT 1:
Great question — this phrase is at the heart of your dynamic architecture.
🔍 What it Means:
“All config values are dynamically bound as attributes” means that after you load a config file (say, a .json
or .toml
), your code takes each key in that config dictionary and adds it as a Python attribute to your object at runtime.
Instead of writing:
self.projects_dir_name = config["projects_dir_name"]
self.exports_dir_name = config["exports_dir_name"]
# etc...
You do:
for key, value in config.items():
setattr(self, key, value)
Now, if config = {"projects_dir_name": "projects", "debug_mode": True}
, then your object will behave like:
print(self.projects_dir_name) # → "projects"
print(self.debug_mode) # → True
These attributes didn't exist at class definition time — they were injected dynamically.
🧠 Why It’s Powerful:
-
You don’t need to hard-code every potential configuration field.
-
You can handle arbitrary, user-defined fields that your class wasn't aware of when you wrote it.
-
Users can feed in a config file, and your object is ready to go — no extra wiring needed.
⚠️ Gotchas:
-
No autocomplete in editors unless you document or manually define expected keys.
-
Typos in config keys won't raise errors until access time:
print(self.exports_dir_name) # raises AttributeError if config had 'export_dir_name'
-
Security: Be careful if configs come from untrusted sources; don’t
setattr()
things like__class__
.
✅ Safe Pattern (recommended in your case):
def _apply_config_dynamically(self):
reserved = {"__class__", "__init__", "scaffold"} # blacklist if needed
for key, value in self.config.items():
if key not in reserved:
setattr(self, key, value)
You could even log each attribute bound, e.g.:
logger.debug(f"Setting attribute {key} = {value}")
Would you like help writing a logging version of this method for your ProjectManager
or ScaffoldController
? Or prefer to try it yourself and I’ll give feedback?
Clayton 2:
give a two paragrpah overview of the balance and responsibilties between pypi, pipx, and ultimate use
ChatGPT 2:
When building and distributing a Python-based project scaffold system like yours, PyPI acts as the foundation. It serves as the official registry where your package (e.g., projectmanager
) is published and versioned. Developers and systems can install it via pip
from any environment. Your PyPI package includes all reusable logic—like your ProjectManager
, config loaders, and ScaffoldController
. The goal here is to make your package modular, importable, and callable from within other Python scripts or environments (Jupyter notebooks, backend apps, CI/CD pipelines, etc.). PyPI is where your library lives.
pipx, by contrast, is how your library becomes a CLI tool—a convenient way to run your CLI commands globally and securely in isolated environments. When someone installs your package via pipx install projectmanager
, they're expecting to be able to type commands like pmx init
in their terminal and have your system scaffold projects or run automation. The CLI defined in your package (via pyproject.toml
entry points) is the public-facing interface, where responsibility shifts from Python developers to operational or scripting users. In short: PyPI gives you broad installability and reusability as a Python library; pipx empowers instant command-line use, without requiring users to activate virtual environments or manage dependencies manually. Together, they bridge the gap between a developer library and a user-facing tool.
Clayton 3:
How will pmx the cli tool differ from cookiecutter? Will pmx just be a cookiecutter wrapper that allows for the injection of configuration?
ChatGPT 3:
Excellent and important question.
🧩 In short:
Yes, pmx
will initially act as a wrapper around Cookiecutter, but its purpose and responsibilities extend beyond just templating. It becomes a higher-level orchestrator that:
-
Injects custom configuration
-
Applies your own project structure conventions
-
Bootstraps a usable runtime environment (e.g., creates a
ProjectManager
instance or writes config files) -
Eventually chains other actions (validation, registration, post-hooks, etc.)
🍪 How pmx
differs from raw Cookiecutter:
Feature | cookiecutter (CLI) |
pmx (your CLI tool) |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Generic project templating tool | Specialized tool for managing and scaffolding Python project systems |
Input | Prompts interactively or from cookiecutter.json |
Structured config files, CLI args, or Python dicts |
Template logic | Uses Jinja2, directory-based templates | Uses Cookiecutter plus your logic: post-processing, logging, etc. |
Extensibility | Requires customizing template internals | You can layer logic outside the template via Python classes |
Project awareness | Blind to your Python objects or runtime | Can return a ProjectManager object, pre-wired for use |
Integration with Python | Not really—just scaffolds folders | Returns live Python objects, registers paths, and launches routines |
Logging and diagnostics | Minimal | Your own structured logs, warnings, dry runs, etc. |
Custom commands | None | You define them: pmx init , pmx run , pmx inspect ... |
🧠 Think of it this way:
-
cookiecutter
is like a template engine -
pmx
is like a construction foreman who calls the template engine, arranges the scaffolding, and wires everything together.
Would you like help sketching out what a post-Cookiecutter pmx init
workflow might do (like generating a default config, creating a ProjectManager
, or printing the next steps)?
Clayton 4:
Okay, let's talk about scope. The purpose is to generate the projectmanager.py file that will live within the source code of some python software, and also to generate the related filestructure which is known to the projectmanger.py code. You can actually leverage the ProjectManager class in that file to generate folders if they are not found. so to be clear, scaffolder and factory can be a part of the rollout tooling, but the ultimate product is a specialized projectmanager.py file.
Here is the way that this has been set up manually in the pipeline software:
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\pipeline> cat .\src\pipeline\projectmanager.py
import os
import toml
import logging
from pathlib import Path
'''
Goal:
Implement default-project.toml variable: use-most-recently-edited-project-directory
'''
### Configure logging (adjust level as needed)
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO, format="%(levelname)s: %(message)s")
class ProjectManager:
# It has been chosen to not make the ProjectManager a singleton if there is to be batch processing.
PROJECTS_DIR_NAME = 'projects'
QUERIES_DIR_NAME = 'queries'
IMPORTS_DIR_NAME = 'imports'
EXPORTS_DIR_NAME = 'exports'
SCRIPTS_DIR_NAME = 'scripts'
CONFIGS_DIR_NAME ='secrets'
SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME ='secrets.yaml'
SECRETS_EXAMPLE_YAML_FILE_NAME ='secrets-example.yaml'
DEFAULT_PROJECT_TOML_FILE_NAME = 'default-project.toml'
TIMESTAMPS_JSON_FILE_NAME = 'timestamps_success.json'
ROOT_DIR = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2] # root directory
# This climbs out of /src/pipeline/ to find the root.
# parents[0] → The directory that contains the (this) Python file.
# parents[1] → The parent of that directory.
# parents[2] → The grandparent directory (which should be the root), if root_pipeline\src\pipeline\
# This organization anticipates PyPi packaging.
def __init__(self, project_name):
self.project_name = project_name
self.projects_dir = self.get_projects_dir()
self.project_dir = self.get_project_dir()
self.exports_dir = self.get_exports_dir()
self.imports_dir = self.get_imports_dir()
self.queries_dir = self.get_queries_dir()
self.configs_dir = self.get_configs_dir()
self.scripts_dir = self.get_scripts_dir()
self.aggregate_dir = self.get_aggregate_dir()
self.check_and_create_dirs(list_dirs =
[self.project_dir,
self.exports_dir,
self.imports_dir,
self.configs_dir,
self.scripts_dir,
self.aggregate_dir])
def get_projects_dir(self):
return self.ROOT_DIR / self.PROJECTS_DIR_NAME
def get_project_dir(self):
return self.get_projects_dir() / self.project_name
def get_exports_dir(self):
return self.project_dir / self.EXPORTS_DIR_NAME
def get_exports_file_path(self, filename):
# Return the full path to the export file
return self.exports_dir / filename
def get_aggregate_dir(self):
# This is for five-minute aggregation data to be stored between hourly bulk passes
# This should become defunct once the tabular trend data request is functional
return self.exports_dir / 'aggregate'
def get_imports_dir(self):
return self.project_dir / self.IMPORTS_DIR_NAME
def get_imports_file_path(self, filename):
# Return the full path to the export file
return self.imports_dir / filename
def get_configs_dir(self):
return self.project_dir / self.CONFIGS_DIR_NAME
def get_configs_secrets_file_path(self):
# Return the full path to the config file
file_path = self.configs_dir / self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME
if not file_path.exists():
logging.warning(f"Configuration file {self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME} not found in:\n{self.configs_dir}.\nHint: Copy and edit the {self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME}.")
print("\n")
choice = str(input(f"Auto-copy {self.SECRETS_EXAMPLE_YAML_FILE_NAME} [Y] or sys.exit() [n] ? "))
if choice.lower().startswith("y"):
file_path = self.get_configs_secrets_file_path_or_copy()
else:
# edge case, expected once per machine, or less, if the user knows to set up a secrets.yaml file.
import sys
sys.exit()
return file_path
def get_configs_secrets_file_path_or_copy(self):
# Return the full path to the config file or create it from the fallback copy if it exists
file_path = self.configs_dir / self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME
fallback_file_path = self.configs_dir / self.SECRETS_EXAMPLE_YAML_FILE_NAME
if not file_path.exists() and fallback_file_path.exists():
import shutil
shutil.copy(fallback_file_path, file_path)
print(f"{self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME} not found, copied from {self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME}")
elif not file_path.exists() and not fallback_file_path.exists():
raise FileNotFoundError(f"Configuration file {self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME} nor {self.SECRETS_EXAMPLE_YAML_FILE_NAME} not found in directory '{self.configs_dir}'.")
return file_path
def get_scripts_dir(self):
return self.project_dir / self.SCRIPTS_DIR_NAME
def get_scripts_file_path(self, filename):
# Return the full path to the config file
return self.get_scripts_dir() / filename
def get_queries_dir(self):
return self.project_dir / self.QUERIES_DIR_NAME
def get_queries_file_path(self,filename): #
# Return the full path to the config file
filepath = self.get_queries_dir() / filename
if not filepath.exists():
raise FileNotFoundError(f"Query filepath={filepath} not found. \nPossible reason: You are in the wrong project directory.")
return filepath
def get_timestamp_success_file_path(self):
# Return the full path to the timestamp file
return self.get_queries_dir() / self.TIMESTAMPS_JSON_FILE_NAME
def check_and_create_dirs(self, list_dirs):
for dir_path in list_dirs:
if not dir_path.exists():
dir_path.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
@classmethod
def identify_default_project(cls):
"""
Class method that reads default-project.toml to identify the default-project.
"""
projects_dir = cls.ROOT_DIR / cls.PROJECTS_DIR_NAME
logging.info(f"projects_dir = {projects_dir}\n")
default_toml_path = projects_dir / cls.DEFAULT_PROJECT_TOML_FILE_NAME
if not default_toml_path.exists():
raise FileNotFoundError(f"Missing {cls.DEFAULT_PROJECT_TOML_FILE_NAME} in {projects_dir}")
with open(default_toml_path, 'r') as f:
data = toml.load(f)
logging.debug(f"data = {data}")
try:
return data['default-project']['project'] # This dictates the proper formatting of the TOML file.
except KeyError as e:
raise KeyError(f"Missing key in {cls.DEFAULT_PROJECT_TOML_FILE_NAME}: {e}")
def get_default_query_file_paths_list(self):
default_query_path = self.get_queries_dir()/ 'default-queries.toml'
with open(default_query_path, 'r') as f:
query_config = toml.load(f)
filenames = query_config['default-query']['files']
if not isinstance(filenames, list):
raise ValueError("Expected a list under ['default-query']['files'] in default-queries.toml")
paths = [self.get_queries_file_path(fname) for fname in filenames]
for path in paths:
if not os.path.exists(path):
raise FileNotFoundError(f"Query file not found: {path}")
return paths
def establish_default_project():
project_name = ProjectManager.identify_default_project()
logging.info(f"project_name = {project_name}")
project_manager = ProjectManager(project_name)
logging.info(f"project_manager.get_project_dir() = {project_manager.get_project_dir()}")
return
def demo_establish_default_project():
establish_default_project()
if __name__ == "__main__":
import sys
cmd = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "default"
if cmd == "demo-default":
demo_establish_default_project()
else:
print("Usage options: \n"
"poetry run python -m pipeline.api.eds demo-default \n")
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\pipeline> ls .\projects\
Directory: C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\pipeline\projects
Mode LastWriteTime Length Name
---- ------------- ------ ----
dar--l 6/17/2025 3:06 PM eds_to_rjn
dar--l 5/23/2025 2:55 PM eds_to_termux
-a---l 6/16/2025 10:43 AM 291 default-project.toml
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\pipeline> ls .\projects\eds_to_rjn\
Directory: C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\pipeline\projects\eds_to_rjn
Mode LastWriteTime Length Name
---- ------------- ------ ----
dar--l 6/24/2025 4:01 PM code
dar--l 6/24/2025 2:14 PM exports
d----l 6/10/2025 5:02 PM history
dar--l 5/23/2025 2:55 PM imports
dar--l 6/26/2025 12:49 PM queries
dar--l 6/27/2025 3:10 PM scripts
dar--l 6/10/2025 5:02 PM secrets
dar--l 5/23/2025 4:06 PM __pycache__
-a---l 4/30/2025 7:35 AM 0 __init__.py
projectmanager.py is a key part of my stack which I plan to leverage in the future for most or all of my software. I do not want to write it from scratch manually each time. And, if it is a good design, I want to make it avaialble to the community.
ChatGPT 4:
That context crystallizes the entire purpose of your tooling beautifully. You're not just scaffolding any Python project—you are generating a custom, tightly integrated projectmanager.py
file that becomes the core infrastructure component for your software. Let’s define the scope and design of your rollout toolchain with clarity:
🎯 Scope: What Are You Actually Building?
✳️ The Goal:
You want to create a CLI (pmx
) that:
-
Generates a customized
projectmanager.py
file (the heart of every project). -
Creates the associated folder structure (
exports/
,queries/
,secrets/
, etc.) that the class expects. -
Optionally bootstraps config files like
secrets-example.yaml
,default-queries.toml
, etc. -
Returns a usable, runnable
ProjectManager
Python object—either programmatically or as part of future CLI automation. -
Makes this whole system reproducible, installable, and community-ready via PyPI and pipx.
🧠 Design Implications
1. pmx
is not just a Cookiecutter wrapper.
It is:
-
A factory and scaffolding engine
-
A code generator
-
A CLI interface to your project architecture conventions
-
A launcher and validator of default project contexts
Cookiecutter is one of the tools it uses, not the product.
2. projectmanager.py
is the product.
Your CLI should:
-
Write a copy of a customizable
projectmanager.py
file into the correctsrc/<package>/
location -
Allow injection of standardized class attribute names (
PROJECTS_DIR_NAME
, etc.) based on config -
Insert documentation blocks, file paths, and optionally register itself via
__init__.py
It is more like a templated code generator than just a skeleton filler.
3. The file structure is not optional—it's required.
projectmanager.py
expects to find certain directories. So:
-
Those must be created at scaffold time, either manually or by
ProjectManager.check_and_create_dirs()
-
You can delegate to
ProjectManager
post-creation to do this validation (which is beautiful design reuse)
🗂️ Your Final Toolchain (Conceptual Overview)
Component | Role | Tooling |
---|---|---|
pmx init |
CLI entrypoint | argparse / typer |
ScaffoldController |
Handles injection of context, paths, and calls Cookiecutter | Python |
Cookiecutter |
Generates base folder + templated projectmanager.py |
Jinja2 |
project_template/ |
Holds the Jinja2 template for projectmanager.py and folders |
files + Jinja |
ProjectFactory (optional) |
Loads config, instantiates ProjectManager class |
Python |
projectmanager.py (generated) |
The canonical path-resolving class in each project | Python code |
🧱 Suggested Project Template Structure
You’ll want your cookiecutter.json
to ask for:
{
"project_slug": "eds_to_rjn",
"projectmanager_module_path": "src/pipeline",
"custom_projects_dir": "projects",
"custom_secrets_dir": "secrets"
}
Then generate:
{{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/
├── {{cookiecutter.projectmanager_module_path}}/
│ └── projectmanager.py ← rendered using Jinja2 with injected dirs
├── projects/
│ └── {{cookiecutter.project_slug}}/
│ ├── configs/
│ ├── exports/
│ ├── queries/
│ └── ...
├── README.md
├── default-project.toml
🔧 How pmx Helps You
The pmx
CLI will:
-
Accept a project name (and optional config overrides)
-
Copy a parameterized version of your
projectmanager.py
into the correct place -
Generate the folders and config files the class needs
-
Return a usable environment (with CLI and Python entrypoints)
-
Log success/failure clearly
✅ Benefits
-
Reuse: never write
projectmanager.py
from scratch again -
Portability: bring this to other departments, orgs, or the public
-
Consistency: every project follows the same rules
-
Extendability: later versions can inject
main.py
, config templates, or even ETL runners
🛠️ Next Steps
Let me know what you'd like to do next:
-
Scaffold the
project_template/
with a Jinja2 version ofprojectmanager.py
? -
Write the logic in
ScaffoldController
to populate the right paths and call Cookiecutter? -
Set up logging inside the controller so you get named logs from each CLI component?
-
Draft the
cookiecutter.json
and sketch what variables you want to allow?
You’re now building a true software foundation generator. This is serious power. 🔌
Clayton 5:
Great. Estimate how much time it will take to succeed in this endeavour. What are a key list of KPI's? What are likely key pitfalls that will prevent success? Generate a JSON file structure summarizing this project to build this toolchain - this will help ensure success over time.
ChatGPT 5:
You're thinking like a project lead now—excellent. Let's define this clearly so you can execute with intention and iterate confidently.
⏳ Estimated Time to Success
Assuming focused development (~1–2 hours/day), here’s a realistic estimate for a first stable version (MVP):
Phase | Description | Time Estimate |
---|---|---|
🔧 Phase 1 | Build CLI + Controller + Logging | 1–2 days |
🍪 Phase 2 | Create Cookiecutter project_template/ |
1–2 days |
📜 Phase 3 | Test and generate projectmanager.py from template |
1–2 days |
🚚 Phase 4 | Integrate config injection, default-project.toml behavior |
1–2 days |
🧪 Phase 5 | Final testing, PyPI prep, pipx packaging | 1–2 days |
✅ Total | From zero to reproducible CLI tooling and PyPI install | ~10 full working hours (5–7 days part-time) |
📈 Key KPIs for Success
Here are the Key Performance Indicators that signal you're succeeding:
{
"kpis": [
"CLI command `pmx init --name myproj` creates correct folder tree",
"`projectmanager.py` is rendered with expected paths and docstrings",
"Generated project runs successfully using `ProjectManager.identify_default_project()`",
"`ProjectManager` handles missing dirs by creating them via `check_and_create_dirs()`",
"`default-project.toml` is automatically created and used",
"Toolchain is pipx-installable from PyPI (`pipx run projectmanager` works)",
"At least one template (`default`) is bundled or available",
"All scaffolded projects follow the same structure and import behavior"
]
}
⚠️ Key Pitfalls to Avoid
These are the common traps or blockers that could stall the project:
{
"pitfalls": [
"Not validating paths or template names correctly in ScaffoldController",
"projectmanager.py template becoming brittle or hardcoded",
"Missing or broken template variables in cookiecutter.json",
"Forgetting to include `templates/` in the PyPI distribution (MANIFEST.in or pyproject.toml)",
"Too much logic in the CLI layer, making it hard to test or reuse",
"Logging misconfigured—silent failures or no feedback to user",
"Lack of test scaffolding for future updates (even 1–2 smoke tests help)",
"Dependencies tightly coupled (e.g., hardcoded `src/` layout without fallback logic)"
]
}
🧾 JSON Blueprint of the Project Toolchain
Below is a project overview file you can save as projectmanager_toolchain.json
or use as a living spec:
{
"project": "ProjectManager Toolchain Generator",
"description": "CLI + Cookiecutter-based system for generating custom Python project infrastructure based on ProjectManager class",
"goals": [
"Generate projectmanager.py file from a template",
"Scaffold required folder structure",
"Use pipx-compatible CLI entrypoints",
"Distribute via PyPI for reuse",
"Load and validate default-project.toml configuration"
],
"components": {
"CLI": {
"module": "cli/main.py",
"framework": "argparse or typer",
"commands": ["init", "scaffold", "validate"]
},
"Controller": {
"module": "controllers/scaffold_controller.py",
"responsibility": "Resolve paths, invoke cookiecutter, log operations"
},
"Template": {
"path": "templates/default/",
"file": "projectmanager.py (Jinja2 template)",
"config": "cookiecutter.json"
},
"Factory": {
"module": "core/factory.py",
"responsibility": "Load config and instantiate ProjectManager"
}
},
"entrypoints": {
"pyproject.toml": {
"script": "pmx = projectmanager.cli.main:main"
}
},
"dependencies": ["cookiecutter", "toml", "pathlib", "logging"],
"publishing": {
"pipx": true,
"pypi": true
},
"kpi_checklist": "See 'kpis' section above",
"estimated_hours_to_success": 10
}
✅ Final Thoughts
You’re building a custom project initializer that generates code and infrastructure, not just boilerplate. With your strong architectural instincts and this structured plan, you're more than equipped to succeed.
Let me know when you’re ready to:
-
Start writing the
cookiecutter.json
-
Build the
projectmanager.py.j2
template -
Set up logging or config validation
I can guide you one keystroke at a time or just do code reviews. Your pace, your control.
Clayton 6:
why do i need both pipx and pypi?
ChatGPT 6:
Great question. You don’t strictly need both, but using both unlocks two different modes of use—one for developers and one for tool users.
Let’s break it down:
🧱 PyPI: The Software Distribution Platform
PyPI (Python Package Index) is where your code lives when it’s published.
You need PyPI to:
-
Let others install your package using
pip install projectmanager
-
Publish official versions (with changelogs, metadata, etc.)
-
Enable reproducibility: install the same version across many machines
-
Share your
ProjectManager
class as a library others canimport
in their Python code
Without PyPI, you’d need to:
-
Manually clone your repo everywhere
-
Or use private package servers or local file installs
✅ PyPI = “Distribute my software.”
🛠 pipx: A Tool for Running Python CLI Apps Globally
pipx is a utility that lets users install and run CLI tools written in Python in isolated environments.
You want pipx if:
-
Your package exposes a CLI like
pmx init
-
You want users to run your tool globally (like
npx
,brew
, or a Linux binary) -
You want to avoid Python virtualenv issues (pipx handles isolation for you)
Without pipx, users would have to:
-
pip install
into a virtualenv manually -
Know how to find your CLI script and run it correctly
✅ pipx = “Run my CLI globally, cleanly, and without user pain.”
🔄 Summary Table
Feature | PyPI | pipx |
---|---|---|
Needed for pip install |
✅ | 🚫 (pipx uses PyPI) |
Needed for global CLI | 🚫 | ✅ |
Good for library usage | ✅ (import projectmanager ) |
🚫 |
Good for CLI tooling | ✅ (required under the hood) | ✅ |
Isolated installs per tool | 🚫 | ✅ |
Used by pipx under the hood | ✅ | ✅ |
🧠 Analogy
PyPI is the supermarket.
pipx is your reusable shopping cart that picks up one product, unpacks it into a clean workspace, and throws away the packaging automatically.
So in your case:
-
You publish your tool to PyPI to make it available.
-
You use pipx to make it easy for non-developers (or busy devs) to run it as a command-line tool.
Together, they give you full reach—from backend script automation to public CLI tooling.
Clayton 7:
great. so in the pypi libaray i can also include functions and modulaes for use in scripting rather than CLI entry-points
elucidate expected entry points and then opportunities for included library functions, divided by entirely necessary for this project to succeed versus optional sprinkles
Bonked for the day on my ChatGPT license
ChatGPT 7:
Clayton 8:
what are some common parlance to describe python packages, projects, source code, etc?
i use the term project to mean a use case. a word document or a powerpoint or a spreadsheet or can be a project - they are not the same as the software itself that builds them, they are only the saved binary encoded file. I want to do ascii encoded projects, which means I need to use folder stricture, configuration files, exports, imports, yada yada yada. I have made a pattern of of python-software/src/python-software/files and python-software/projects/project-name, where the works src and projects are very important literal directory names
I think when i discuss this strucutre with chat gpt, it gets confounded, because it think i am using the work project synonmoualy with package or software, but i am not, a project is a use case
ChatGPT 8:
Ah, I see what you mean — the word "project" is overloaded in software discussions, and your usage is distinct from typical developer jargon. Let's clarify some common parlance around Python (and software in general) to help you frame your concepts clearly and avoid confusion, especially when chatting with tools like ChatGPT.
Common terms and their typical meanings:
Term | Common Meaning in Software / Python Context | Your Usage / Notes |
---|---|---|
Project | Usually the entire codebase and resources for building software, or a development workspace (could include source code, tests, docs, configs). | You mean a use case instance — e.g., a saved document, or a workspace with input files and configs for a specific dataset or analysis. |
Package | A Python package is a directory with an __init__.py , containing Python modules; or a distributable library published to PyPI. |
Your "software" or "tool" that runs and processes projects. |
Module | A single .py file containing Python code, part of a package. |
Same. |
Source code | The raw code files that implement the software. | Same. |
Workspace | Sometimes used to mean a folder or environment containing a project or multiple projects. | Could map to your "project" folder if it holds all files for a use case. |
Configuration file | A file (e.g., .toml , .ini , .json , .yaml ) that defines parameters, settings, or metadata for software or a project. |
Same. |
Data files / assets | Files your software processes or generates, like spreadsheets, documents, images, etc. | Could be part of your "project" folder. |
Repository | Usually a version-controlled source code collection (like a git repo). | Could contain multiple projects or packages. |
Your structure explained with this vocabulary:
-
python-software/
— The root folder of your entire software toolset. -
python-software/src/
— The source code of your software package/library. -
python-software/files/
— Shared static resources or common files for the software. -
python-software/projects/project-name/
— A project in your terminology: a folder representing a specific use case instance, with its own configs, input files, exports, etc.
Why ChatGPT gets confused:
GPT often expects project to mean the software/codebase itself, because in developer discussions “project” is often synonymous with the code or repo you’re actively developing.
When you say “project” means a use case instance — like a saved document or a dataset workspace — GPT might try to interpret it as “the software project,” causing confusion.
Suggestions to reduce confusion:
-
Use "use case" or "workspace" or "instance" instead of "project" when you mean your data/config folder.
For example:-
python-software/workspaces/workspace-name/
-
python-software/use_cases/use-case-name/
This can help distinguish the software project (your codebase) from the user data/config folder.
-
-
Define your terms explicitly when discussing with ChatGPT or collaborators.
For example:In this context, a project refers to a specific user case folder containing ASCII-encoded configs and data files, not the software codebase.
-
Be consistent in your file structure naming, and consider adding README or metadata files that explain the purpose of each folder.
Summary for you
Your term | Suggested term for clearer communication (optional) | Meaning |
---|---|---|
project | use case, workspace, dataset, user project | Folder with input/config/output files for a use case instance |
python software | software project, package, library | The source code and tooling you develop |
src | source code | The Python package code itself |
files | resources, static files, common files | Shared files used by the software |
If you want, I can help you draft a terminology guide or README snippet that explains your exact definitions so your codebase and communications are crystal clear. Would that be helpful?
Clayton 9:
okay, it seems like the word "workspace" is closer to how i intend to use "projevt". in another session, I was discussing generating a configurable projectmanager.py file, with a pipx cli called "pmx" leveraging cookiecuttter for rollout. It sounds like i should change the name to "workspacemanager.py" instead, and the cli tool can be called wsmx
ChatGPT 9:
Yeah, that sounds like a smart move!
Using "workspace" instead of "project" for your use case folders aligns well with common parlance and makes the distinction clearer between:
-
The software codebase you develop (your Python package, source, tooling, etc.)
-
The user-configurable data/config folders where specific use cases or sessions happen (your "workspaces")
So renaming:
-
projectmanager.py
→workspacemanager.py
-
CLI tool from
pmx
→wsmx
makes it more intuitive and avoids that common confusion. Plus, workspace is a term already familiar to many devs and users for an isolated environment or context, which fits your use case well.
If you want, I can help you with:
-
Naming conventions or best practices for your workspace manager
-
Drafting README snippets or CLI help text that clarifies the roles of your software vs workspaces
-
Ideas for how to structure your workspace folders for best UX
Would you like me to help with any of that?
Clayton 10:
are there existing tools like this? rather than me rebuilding the wheel
ChatGPT 10:
Great question — yes, there are existing tools that cover parts of this space, but none that fully match your exact use case (managing configurable workspaces or use-case folders with a Python-based CLI, scaffolding, and integrated config management exactly like your described “projectmanager.py”).
Here’s a quick overview:
Existing related tools or concepts
-
Cookiecutter
The de facto standard for templated project scaffolding. You’re already using this well.
It can generate folder structures and config files from templates, but it’s not opinionated about managing multiple workspaces or runtime logic. -
PyScaffold
Python package scaffolding tool. Focused on creating Python library or application skeletons, not managing use-case workspaces. -
Poetry / Hatch
Manage packaging, dependencies, and virtual environments. Not about workspace/use-case folders or runtime project management. -
pipx
Install and run Python CLI tools globally and isolated. Useful for your CLI distribution but not a workspace manager itself. -
Cookiecutter + custom CLI
Common pattern to build your own CLI on top of cookiecutter to create and manage multiple workspace folders. -
DVC (Data Version Control) and MLFlow
Manage data science experiment workspaces, datasets, and configurations. Somewhat similar conceptually but tailored to data science and ML workflows. -
Cookiecutter Data Science
A data science project template using cookiecutter, but again mostly scaffolding — no CLI runtime workspace manager.
Why building your own workspacemanager.py
+ CLI makes sense
-
Your concept of a “workspace” as a configurable, ASCII-based use case folder with imports/exports, defaults, and explicit folder structure is quite domain-specific.
-
You want runtime awareness (loading configs, identifying active workspace, ensuring folder existence, exporting/importing data) plus CLI scaffolding.
-
Most existing tools provide either scaffolding or runtime configuration parsing — rarely both tightly integrated in a reusable, pipx-installable CLI.
What to reuse
-
Definitely keep using Cookiecutter for generating initial workspace templates.
-
Use Toml or YAML for config files (
default-project.toml
etc.). -
Use Python’s
pathlib
for path management. -
Use logging to surface CLI and runtime events.
-
Use pipx to distribute your CLI cleanly.
-
Use
typer
orargparse
for the CLI interface (Typer gives a nicer developer experience).
What you’ll likely have to build/customize yourself
-
The WorkspaceManager class (formerly ProjectManager) that can:
-
Identify current workspace from config or environment
-
Validate and create workspace folder structure
-
Load workspace-specific settings and apply defaults
-
Provide import/export helpers linked to that workspace
-
Expose these via a clean CLI interface
-
-
The CLI tool (
wsmx
) that can:-
Initialize new workspace from template
-
Switch/activate workspaces
-
List existing workspaces
-
Validate workspace config
-
Run custom commands related to your workflows
-
Summary
Feature | Existing Tool | Your Use Case |
---|---|---|
Folder scaffolding from template | Cookiecutter | Use directly |
CLI for workspace management | Partial (cookiecutter CLI, DVC MLFlow) | Build your own (wsmx ) |
Workspace config parsing | toml / yaml |
Use directly |
Distribution as isolated CLI | pipx | Use directly |
Runtime workspace management | Custom | Build your own (workspacemanager.py ) |
TL;DR
No full out-of-the-box tool does exactly what you want, but you’re on the right track by combining cookiecutter + pipx + a custom Python class + CLI.
This pattern is common, practical, and lets you control exactly how your “workspaces” behave.
If you want, I can help you:
-
Design the workspace manager API and CLI commands
-
Provide boilerplate cookiecutter templates
-
Suggest folder layouts and config schemas
-
Draft example code for your
workspacemanager.py
and CLI toolwsmx
Just say the word!
Clayton 11:
CLI runtime workspace manager
what does this mean? Why do i need runtime logic?
ChatGPT 11:
Great question! Let me unpack it:
What is a CLI runtime workspace manager?
-
CLI — a Command-Line Interface tool (like
git
,pip
, or yourwsmx
) you run from a terminal. -
Workspace manager — a tool that manages your workspaces (the folders holding your use-case data, configs, exports, etc.).
-
Runtime — means the tool does more than just create folder structures; it also runs during normal use to load, validate, and manipulate those workspaces while your software or user is actively working.
Why do you need runtime logic?
-
Beyond scaffolding: managing the workspace state during use
You don’t just want to create a workspace once. You want to:-
Load and recognize the active workspace when your software runs or when your CLI commands are invoked.
-
Check that the workspace folder structure is intact and create missing folders if needed.
-
Read and apply configuration settings stored in the workspace (e.g., default export formats, import rules).
-
Support switching between multiple workspaces or “projects.”
-
Provide helpers to import/export data inside that workspace context.
-
Possibly update or save workspace metadata dynamically.
-
-
Consistency and error prevention
Runtime checks can prevent your software from crashing if files or folders are missing, or if config files are corrupt or incomplete. -
Better user experience
A CLI with runtime logic can give immediate feedback, list available workspaces, validate configs before a long-running process starts, or help migrate workspace structures if you change your standards. -
Automation & scripting
Your CLI or Python code can use the runtime workspace manager API to automate workflows—e.g., batch processing all workspaces, switching contexts in scripts, or generating reports per workspace.
Analogy
-
Think of Cookiecutter as a hammer: it helps you build the initial house frame (folder structure).
-
A runtime workspace manager is like your house manager or caretaker: it keeps the house clean, makes sure the doors/windows work, repairs damage, and controls what happens inside while you live there.
Summary
Aspect | Scaffolding Only | Runtime Workspace Manager |
---|---|---|
When active | Once, during workspace creation | Every time you use the workspace |
What it does | Creates folders & files from template | Loads configs, validates workspace, manages paths, imports/exports, switches contexts |
Why important | Sets initial state | Maintains consistent, error-free workspace usage over time |
So, runtime logic means your CLI and Python class actively manage the workspace whenever your software or user interacts with it — not just once at creation.
If you want, I can show a simple example of runtime workspace manager code or CLI commands that illustrate this in practice!
Clayton 12:
okay.
let's make this as basic as possible to achieve a minimum viable product
I think I do want cookie cutter. let's build a cookeicutter tool that can stnad up a standard scaffold ()non configurable at this time). so wsmx can really just be about putting the workspacemanager.py (formerly projectmanager.py) file in the right place, and then triggering workspacemanager.check_and_create_dirs()
hypothetically new software i write can use either the software/src/software scheme or instead software/software, though workspacemanager will much more likely be used with the former
ChatGPT 12:
Got it! Let’s design a minimal MVP that combines cookiecutter scaffolding with a simple workspacemanager.py
that does directory checks and creation.
MVP plan overview
-
Cookiecutter template:
A fixed, non-configurable folder scaffold with:workspace-template/ ├── workspacemanager.py ├── config/ │ └── default-workspace.toml ├── data/ ├── exports/ └── imports/
(Or whatever folder structure you want to standardize.)
-
workspacemanager.py:
A Python class with minimal API:-
check_and_create_dirs()
— ensure required folders exist, create if missing -
identify_workspace()
— readdefault-workspace.toml
or infer workspace name/path -
(Optional) basic logging
-
-
CLI
wsmx
:-
wsmx init
— uses cookiecutter to scaffold the workspace folder (copy fromworkspace-template
) -
wsmx check
— runsworkspacemanager.check_and_create_dirs()
for the current workspace -
(Optional)
wsmx info
— print workspace info
-
-
Folder scheme:
-
You can use either
software/src/software
orsoftware/software
for your software source code. -
workspacemanager.py
expects to be called from inside the workspace folder created by cookiecutter. -
The workspace folder holds config, data, imports, exports, and
workspacemanager.py
.
-
Why this works for MVP
-
Cookiecutter handles scaffolding — you don’t reinvent folder creation logic.
-
workspacemanager.py
is a simple runtime utility to verify workspace integrity. -
CLI
wsmx
wraps cookiecutter + runtime check commands. -
No configurability yet, but easily extensible later.
Next steps — I can help generate:
-
A basic cookiecutter template folder with the folder tree and stub files
-
The minimal
workspacemanager.py
code withcheck_and_create_dirs()
-
A minimal CLI script using
typer
orargparse
forwsmx
withinit
andcheck
commands -
Example
default-workspace.toml
config file
Does this sound like the MVP you want?
If yes, I’ll start with the cookiecutter template structure and workspacemanager.py
code snippet!
Clayton 13:
workspace-template/
├── config/
│ └── default-workspace.toml
├── data/
├── exports/
└── imports/
this is wrong
the workspacemanager.py does not belong inside of the workspace folder. this is entirely incorrect. the workspacemanager is a a module that lives in my-software-name/src/my-software-name/, while workspaces live in my-software-name/workspaces/workspace0, my-software-name/workspaces/workspace1, my-software-name/workspaces/workspace2, etc. Each workspace0, workspace1, workspace2 all have the same structure, which can be built using check_and_create_dirs() is a new workspace name is fed into the initilization of the WorkspaceManager class
ChatGPT 13:
Ah, thanks for the clarification! That makes total sense — let's get the architecture right:
Correct structure and responsibilities:
1. WorkspaceManager module (your software code)
-
Lives inside your Python source:
my-software-name/ ├── src/ │ └── my_software_name/ │ └── workspacemanager.py <-- The module, reusable code ├── workspaces/ <-- Folder holding all workspace instances │ ├── workspace0/ │ ├── workspace1/ │ └── workspace2/ └── ... other source and configs
2. Each workspace folder
-
my-software-name/workspaces/workspace0/
-
Has a standardized structure (created/verified by
WorkspaceManager.check_and_create_dirs()
), e.g.:workspace0/ ├── config/ │ └── default-workspace.toml ├── data/ ├── imports/ └── exports/
What WorkspaceManager
does:
-
On initialization, it receives a workspace path (e.g.,
my-software-name/workspaces/workspace0
) -
check_and_create_dirs()
verifies or creates the above standardized folder structure inside that workspace path -
It can load config files like
default-workspace.toml
from the workspace config folder -
It provides methods to read/write/import/export files within that workspace
What the CLI (wsmx
) does:
-
wsmx init workspace0
-
Instantiates
WorkspaceManager
with pathmy-software-name/workspaces/workspace0
-
Calls
check_and_create_dirs()
to scaffold the folder structure inside that workspace folder -
Optionally create the workspace folder itself if missing
-
-
wsmx check workspace0
- Runs
check_and_create_dirs()
to ensure workspace0’s structure is intact
- Runs
-
(Later) you can add commands to list, switch, or operate on workspaces
Summary of key separation:
Component | Location | Responsibility |
---|---|---|
workspacemanager.py |
src/my_software_name/ |
Code module managing workspace folders and config |
Workspaces | workspaces/workspace0 , workspace1 , etc. |
Contain user/config data, created/managed by WorkspaceManager |
CLI wsmx |
Installed CLI entrypoint, uses WorkspaceManager |
Initialize or validate workspaces from CLI |
If you want, I can now generate a minimal workspacemanager.py
example that:
-
Accepts workspace path on init
-
Has
check_and_create_dirs()
method that createsconfig/
,data/
,imports/
,exports/
folders inside the workspace -
Loads a
default-workspace.toml
file fromconfig/
folder if it exists
and a minimal CLI wsmx
example that calls it with workspace name argument.
Does that sound perfect for your MVP?
Clayton 14:
elucidate that the hierarchy provided is wrong. We want
my-software-name/
├── src/
│ └── my_software_name/
│ └── workspacemanager.py <-- The module, reusable code
├── workspaces/ <-- Folder holding all workspace instances
│ ├── workspace0/
│ ├── workspace1/
│ └── workspace2/
└── ... other source and configs
more details....
ChatGPT 14:
Thanks for sharing this comprehensive ProjectManager
class! I can definitely see how this is a solid, real-world, production-ready base — with directory management, config loading, file path helpers, and a good CLI demo entry.
What I observe about your current class vs minimal MVP examples:
Aspect | Your Class (ProjectManager) | Minimal MVP Version |
---|---|---|
Directory constants | Multiple dir names + filenames constants | Just a simple fixed list of folder names |
Root directory logic | Dynamic, climbs 2 parents for root folder | Assumes relative paths or cwd |
Config loading | Uses toml, loads multiple config files (default-project.toml, default-queries.toml) | Just loads default-workspace.toml if present |
Directory creation | check_and_create_dirs() creates many dirs |
Same, but fewer dirs |
File path getters | Multiple helper methods for imports, exports, configs, queries, scripts | None or minimal |
User interaction | Prompts user to copy secrets file if missing | None |
Logging | Configured logging and warnings | Minimal print statements |
CLI interface | Demo __main__ for default project identification |
Simple Typer CLI in example |
Refactoring path to WorkspaceManager
The main change you want is to rename ProjectManager → WorkspaceManager and possibly tweak naming to reflect “workspace” rather than “project” (like WORKSPACES_DIR_NAME
instead of PROJECTS_DIR_NAME
).
Suggestions for a clean rename/refactor:
-
Rename class and constants:
-
ProjectManager
→WorkspaceManager
-
PROJECTS_DIR_NAME
→WORKSPACES_DIR_NAME
(e.g.'workspaces'
) -
DEFAULT_PROJECT_TOML_FILE_NAME
→DEFAULT_WORKSPACE_TOML_FILE_NAME
-
-
Update all references consistently (method names, variable names, docstrings, logging messages).
-
Optionally rename method
identify_default_project()
→identify_default_workspace()
. -
Consider whether to keep user prompts for secrets file copying or move that responsibility elsewhere (CLI?).
-
Make sure root path logic still matches your repo structure (i.e., climb parents correctly).
Would you like me to:
-
Generate a fully refactored
workspacemanager.py
based on your code with these renames and minimal cleanup? -
Add comments and docstrings aligned with the workspace terminology?
-
Provide a minimal CLI wrapper example to go with it?
I can do all of these quickly to help you bootstrap your rollout. Just let me know!
Clayton 15:
your 1,2,3,5 suggestions should be implemented i a new version. dont worry about 4 for now. give me you workspacemanager.py, with comments and docstrings. and the cli wrapper example.
ChatGPT 15:
Sure! Here’s a fully refactored workspacemanager.py
implementing your requested changes (renames, updated constants, improved comments and docstrings), plus a minimal CLI wrapper example using typer
.
workspacemanager.py
import os
import toml
import logging
from pathlib import Path
"""
WorkspaceManager class
Manages the folder structure, configuration, and file paths for individual workspaces
under a root workspaces directory. Handles creation and validation of workspace folders,
loading configuration files, and helper methods for common workspace file locations.
This class assumes a root directory layout similar to:
my-software-name/
├── src/
│ └── my_software_name/
│ └── workspacemanager.py # this file
├── workspaces/
│ ├── workspace0/
│ │ ├── config/
│ │ │ └── default-workspace.toml
│ │ ├── data/
│ │ ├── imports/
│ │ └── exports/
│ ├── workspace1/
│ └── ...
"""
# Configure logging (adjust level as needed)
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO, format="%(levelname)s: %(message)s")
class WorkspaceManager:
"""
WorkspaceManager encapsulates management of an individual workspace,
including directory creation, config loading, and path helpers.
Attributes:
workspace_name (str): The name of the workspace.
variables (dict): Optional dict of override variables.
ROOT_DIR (Path): The root directory of the repo (assumed 2 levels above this file).
"""
WORKSPACES_DIR_NAME = "workspaces"
QUERIES_DIR_NAME = "queries"
IMPORTS_DIR_NAME = "imports"
EXPORTS_DIR_NAME = "exports"
SCRIPTS_DIR_NAME = "scripts"
CONFIGS_DIR_NAME = "config"
SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME = "secrets.yaml"
SECRETS_EXAMPLE_YAML_FILE_NAME = "secrets-example.yaml"
DEFAULT_WORKSPACE_TOML_FILE_NAME = "default-workspace.toml"
TIMESTAMPS_JSON_FILE_NAME = "timestamps_success.json"
# Determine root directory by climbing two levels above this file
ROOT_DIR = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
def __init__(self, workspace_name, variables=None):
"""
Initialize a WorkspaceManager instance.
Args:
workspace_name (str): The name of the workspace (e.g. 'workspace0').
variables (dict, optional): Optional override variables (currently unused).
"""
self.workspace_name = workspace_name
self.variables = variables or {}
# Setup paths
self.workspaces_dir = self.get_workspaces_dir()
self.workspace_dir = self.get_workspace_dir()
self.exports_dir = self.get_exports_dir()
self.imports_dir = self.get_imports_dir()
self.queries_dir = self.get_queries_dir()
self.configs_dir = self.get_configs_dir()
self.scripts_dir = self.get_scripts_dir()
self.aggregate_dir = self.get_aggregate_dir()
# Ensure essential directories exist
self.check_and_create_dirs(
[
self.workspace_dir,
self.exports_dir,
self.imports_dir,
self.configs_dir,
self.scripts_dir,
self.aggregate_dir,
]
)
def get_workspaces_dir(self):
"""
Return the root workspaces directory path.
Returns:
Path: The path to the 'workspaces' directory.
"""
return self.ROOT_DIR / self.WORKSPACES_DIR_NAME
def get_workspace_dir(self):
"""
Return the full path to this workspace directory.
Returns:
Path: The path to this workspace folder.
"""
return self.get_workspaces_dir() / self.workspace_name
def get_exports_dir(self):
"""
Return the exports directory path inside the workspace.
Returns:
Path: The exports directory path.
"""
return self.workspace_dir / self.EXPORTS_DIR_NAME
def get_exports_file_path(self, filename):
"""
Return the full path to an export file inside the exports directory.
Args:
filename (str): Export filename.
Returns:
Path: Full path to the export file.
"""
return self.exports_dir / filename
def get_aggregate_dir(self):
"""
Return the directory for aggregate data inside exports.
Returns:
Path: Aggregate data directory path.
"""
return self.exports_dir / "aggregate"
def get_imports_dir(self):
"""
Return the imports directory path inside the workspace.
Returns:
Path: The imports directory path.
"""
return self.workspace_dir / self.IMPORTS_DIR_NAME
def get_imports_file_path(self, filename):
"""
Return the full path to an import file inside the imports directory.
Args:
filename (str): Import filename.
Returns:
Path: Full path to the import file.
"""
return self.imports_dir / filename
def get_configs_dir(self):
"""
Return the config directory path inside the workspace.
Returns:
Path: The config directory path.
"""
return self.workspace_dir / self.CONFIGS_DIR_NAME
def get_configs_secrets_file_path(self):
"""
Return the path to the secrets.yaml config file.
If the file is missing, prompts the user to auto-copy from an example file,
or exits the program.
Returns:
Path: Path to secrets.yaml
Raises:
SystemExit: If secrets file is missing and user declines to auto-copy.
"""
file_path = self.configs_dir / self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME
if not file_path.exists():
logging.warning(
f"Configuration file {self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME} not found in:\n"
f"{self.configs_dir}.\nHint: Copy and edit the {self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME}."
)
print("\n")
choice = str(
input(
f"Auto-copy {self.SECRETS_EXAMPLE_YAML_FILE_NAME} [Y] or sys.exit() [n] ? "
)
)
if choice.lower().startswith("y"):
file_path = self.get_configs_secrets_file_path_or_copy()
else:
import sys
sys.exit()
return file_path
def get_configs_secrets_file_path_or_copy(self):
"""
Copy secrets-example.yaml to secrets.yaml if missing.
Returns:
Path: Path to the copied secrets.yaml file.
Raises:
FileNotFoundError: If neither secrets.yaml nor secrets-example.yaml exists.
"""
file_path = self.configs_dir / self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME
fallback_file_path = self.configs_dir / self.SECRETS_EXAMPLE_YAML_FILE_NAME
if not file_path.exists() and fallback_file_path.exists():
import shutil
shutil.copy(fallback_file_path, file_path)
print(
f"{self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME} not found, copied from {self.SECRETS_EXAMPLE_YAML_FILE_NAME}"
)
elif not file_path.exists() and not fallback_file_path.exists():
raise FileNotFoundError(
f"Configuration file {self.SECRETS_YAML_FILE_NAME} nor {self.SECRETS_EXAMPLE_YAML_FILE_NAME} "
f"found in directory '{self.configs_dir}'."
)
return file_path
def get_scripts_dir(self):
"""
Return the scripts directory path inside the workspace.
Returns:
Path: The scripts directory path.
"""
return self.workspace_dir / self.SCRIPTS_DIR_NAME
def get_scripts_file_path(self, filename):
"""
Return the full path to a script file inside the scripts directory.
Args:
filename (str): Script filename.
Returns:
Path: Full path to the script file.
"""
return self.get_scripts_dir() / filename
def get_queries_dir(self):
"""
Return the queries directory path inside the workspace.
Returns:
Path: The queries directory path.
"""
return self.workspace_dir / self.QUERIES_DIR_NAME
def get_queries_file_path(self, filename):
"""
Return the full path to a query file inside the queries directory.
Args:
filename (str): Query filename.
Returns:
Path: Full path to the query file.
Raises:
FileNotFoundError: If query file does not exist.
"""
filepath = self.get_queries_dir() / filename
if not filepath.exists():
raise FileNotFoundError(
f"Query filepath={filepath} not found. \nPossible reason: You are in the wrong workspace directory."
)
return filepath
def get_timestamp_success_file_path(self):
"""
Return the full path to the timestamps success JSON file.
Returns:
Path: Path to timestamps_success.json file.
"""
return self.get_queries_dir() / self.TIMESTAMPS_JSON_FILE_NAME
def check_and_create_dirs(self, list_dirs):
"""
Create directories in the provided list if they do not already exist.
Args:
list_dirs (list of Path): List of directory paths to verify/create.
"""
for dir_path in list_dirs:
if not dir_path.exists():
logging.info(f"Creating missing directory: {dir_path}")
dir_path.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
@classmethod
def identify_default_workspace(cls):
"""
Class method to identify the default workspace by reading default-workspace.toml.
Returns:
str: The name of the default workspace.
Raises:
FileNotFoundError: If the default-workspace.toml file is missing.
KeyError: If expected keys are missing from the TOML file.
"""
workspaces_dir = cls.ROOT_DIR / cls.WORKSPACES_DIR_NAME
logging.info(f"workspaces_dir = {workspaces_dir}\n")
default_toml_path = workspaces_dir / cls.DEFAULT_WORKSPACE_TOML_FILE_NAME
if not default_toml_path.exists():
raise FileNotFoundError(
f"Missing {cls.DEFAULT_WORKSPACE_TOML_FILE_NAME} in {workspaces_dir}"
)
with open(default_toml_path, "r") as f:
data = toml.load(f)
logging.debug(f"data = {data}")
try:
return data["default-workspace"]["workspace"]
except KeyError as e:
raise KeyError(
f"Missing key in {cls.DEFAULT_WORKSPACE_TOML_FILE_NAME}: {e}"
)
def get_default_query_file_paths_list(self):
"""
Load the list of default query file paths from default-queries.toml in the queries dir.
Returns:
list of Path: List of query file paths.
Raises:
FileNotFoundError: If any query file does not exist.
ValueError: If the expected list structure is missing or invalid.
"""
default_query_path = self.get_queries_dir() / "default-queries.toml"
with open(default_query_path, "r") as f:
query_config = toml.load(f)
filenames = query_config["default-query"]["files"]
if not isinstance(filenames, list):
raise ValueError(
"Expected a list under ['default-query']['files'] in default-queries.toml"
)
paths = [self.get_queries_file_path(fname) for fname in filenames]
for path in paths:
if not os.path.exists(path):
raise FileNotFoundError(f"Query file not found: {path}")
return paths
def establish_default_workspace():
"""
Helper function to instantiate WorkspaceManager for the default workspace
identified by default-workspace.toml, and log some info.
"""
workspace_name = WorkspaceManager.identify_default_workspace()
logging.info(f"workspace_name = {workspace_name}")
workspace_manager = WorkspaceManager(workspace_name)
logging.info(f"workspace_manager.get_workspace_dir() = {workspace_manager.get_workspace_dir()}")
return
def demo_establish_default_workspace():
"""
Demo entrypoint to show loading and info for the default workspace.
"""
establish_default_workspace()
if __name__ == "__main__":
import sys
cmd = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "default"
if cmd == "demo-default":
demo_establish_default_workspace()
else:
print(
Clayton 16:
notice that the same patterns are used for the expected directories, in terms of path retrieval with getters functions. the getter functions themselves provide the embedded hierarchy.
instead of this, the hierarchy could all be included in the class variables
also note that you are missing the secrets/ dir
could a json file be used to represent the scaffolding?
ChatGPT 16:
Absolutely — you're picking up on an important design pattern here: right now, the class encodes directory structure via imperative getter methods, but you could instead express the entire workspace folder hierarchy declaratively (e.g., in a JSON or dict), which would centralize the structure, simplify check_and_create_dirs()
, and make your design more flexible and inspectable.
✅ Yes — a JSON file can (and often should) be used to represent the workspace scaffold
That approach allows:
-
Defining folder and file layout in one place (easy to read, test, modify, extend)
-
Possibly versioning scaffold layouts
-
Dynamically applying templates or conditional folder inclusion later
-
Code and CLI tools that read the structure instead of hardcoding it
✅ Also yes — you can refactor the hierarchy into class variables like:
FOLDER_HIERARCHY = {
"": [
"config",
"data",
"imports",
"exports",
"scripts",
"secrets",
"queries"
],
"exports": ["aggregate"],
"config": ["default-workspace.toml"],
"secrets": ["secrets.yaml", "secrets-example.yaml"],
"queries": ["default-queries.toml"],
}
Where keys are parent dirs (relative to workspace root) and values are subfolders or required files.
🔁 Refactored example: centralizing the scaffold
SCAFFOLD_LAYOUT = {
"": ["config", "data", "imports", "exports", "scripts", "secrets", "queries"],
"exports": ["aggregate"],
"config": ["default-workspace.toml"],
"secrets": ["secrets.yaml", "secrets-example.yaml"],
"queries": ["default-queries.toml"]
}
Then:
def check_and_create_dirs(self):
"""
Create folders and placeholder files as defined in SCAFFOLD_LAYOUT.
"""
for parent, children in self.SCAFFOLD_LAYOUT.items():
base_path = self.workspace_dir / parent
for child in children:
target_path = base_path / child
if "." in child: # crude way to assume it's a file
if not target_path.exists():
target_path.touch()
logging.info(f"Created file: {target_path}")
else:
if not target_path.exists():
target_path.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
logging.info(f"Created folder: {target_path}")
🧩 Advanced: Load scaffold layout from JSON
// scaffold.json
{
"": ["config", "data", "imports", "exports", "scripts", "secrets", "queries"],
"exports": ["aggregate"],
"config": ["default-workspace.toml"],
"secrets": ["secrets.yaml", "secrets-example.yaml"],
"queries": ["default-queries.toml"]
}
Then in Python:
with open("scaffold.json") as f:
self.SCAFFOLD_LAYOUT = json.load(f)
This separates logic from structure definition, and even allows future use cases like:
-
--minimal
or--extended
layouts -
per-software scaffold profiles
-
workspace versioning/migration logic
🧠 Summary
Pattern | Description |
---|---|
Getter-based hierarchy | Easy to follow, but hardcoded and spread across methods |
Class variable hierarchy | Better centralized layout, easier to manage and refactor |
JSON-based scaffold | Most flexible, allows decoupled structure from logic, easier to version |
Would you like me to:
-
Implement the centralized class-variable approach in
WorkspaceManager
? -
Or create a
scaffold.json
file and refactorcheck_and_create_dirs()
to read it?
Or both?
Clayton 17:
can the WorkspaceManager class have modularized getter functions that repsect the dictionary loaded from the scaffold.json file? Or instead the scaffold.json file can be fed into a code generator to build an explicit WorkspaceManager class. Or maybe there is a third approach.
ChatGPT 17:
Excellent question — and you're absolutely circling around the three core strategies worth considering. Let's break them down and evaluate:
✅ 1. Dynamic Getters via Dict (Runtime-Resolved Paths)
Idea:
You load scaffold.json
into a structure (e.g., SCAFFOLD_LAYOUT
), then have dynamic methods that resolve any key via a single generic getter:
def get_path(self, key: str) -> Path:
"""
Generic getter that resolves a scaffold path key to a Path object.
E.g. 'exports', 'queries/default-queries.toml'
"""
parts = key.split("/")
path = self.workspace_dir
for part in parts:
path = path / part
return path
Pros:
-
Single source of truth in the scaffold file
-
No code duplication
-
Can easily list/inspect all known scaffold keys
-
Great for iteration, automation, testing
Cons:
-
Not explicit in code — harder for IDEs, linters, or type checkers
-
You’d have to write your own access patterns like:
wm.get_path("exports/aggregate")
✅ Best for: Flexible tools, CLI-based scripting, extensibility
✅ 2. Code Generator (Scaffold-to-Class Compiler)
Idea:
You write a script that takes scaffold.json
and emits a Python file like workspacemanager.py
, with:
def get_exports_dir(self) -> Path:
return self.workspace_dir / "exports"
def get_queries_file(self) -> Path:
return self.get_queries_dir() / "default-queries.toml"
Pros:
-
IDE and linter friendly
-
Fully explicit
-
Very clear for onboarding and reading
Cons:
-
Introduces a build step (
generate_workspace_manager.py
) -
You lose DRY — two sources of truth unless you only maintain the JSON and regenerate class
-
You must rerun generation on every scaffold change
✅ Best for: Well-defined, stable structures with human-readable APIs
✅ 3. Hybrid Approach: Declarative + Fallback Access
Idea:
-
Use
scaffold.json
as the structure definition -
Provide explicit getters for high-value paths (
get_exports_dir()
, etc.) -
Provide a fallback
get_path("key")
method for everything else
Example:
def get_exports_dir(self):
return self.get_path("exports")
def get_queries_file(self):
return self.get_path("queries/default-queries.toml")
And support fallback for unknown keys:
workspace.get_path("scripts/setup.py")
Pros:
-
IDE-friendly where it matters
-
Still fully DRY and declarative
-
You can document “known paths” clearly, but still allow on-the-fly logic
✅ Best for: Real-world use where maintainability and extensibility matter
Recommendation
Goal | Best Approach |
---|---|
Rapid prototyping | Dynamic getters only (Option 1) |
Distribution-ready SDK or API | Hybrid (Option 3) |
Full control, static analysis | Code generator (Option 2) |
Next Steps — What I Can Build for You:
-
✅ Option 1: Implement dynamic path logic via
get_path(key)
-
✅ Option 2: Generate a
workspacemanager.py
fromscaffold.json
-
✅ Option 3: Scaffold a hybrid version, with a few common explicit methods + fallback
Would you like to proceed with the hybrid version as your next evolution?
If yes, I’ll:
-
Design a
scaffold.json
for your current layout -
Implement fallback
get_path()
logic -
Include 3–5 common explicit methods (like
get_exports_dir()
,get_queries_file()
)
Let me know!
Clayton 18:
the hybrid sounds pretty great.
recall that we are building the path and workspace management core of my stack, so explicit searchable code is best i think.
what is DRY?
ChatGPT 18:
Excellent — hybrid it is! That’s a strong choice for building the path and workspace management core of your stack — it gives you clarity, explicit control, and room to scale.
🧼 What is DRY?
DRY stands for:
Don’t Repeat Yourself
It’s a core software engineering principle that says:
Every piece of knowledge or logic should exist in a single, unambiguous place in your codebase.
Why it matters:
-
Reduces bugs (if you change something in one place, you don’t forget to change it elsewhere)
-
Makes your code easier to maintain and reason about
-
Helps future collaborators (or your future self) avoid unintended duplication
❌ Not DRY Example:
def get_exports_dir(self):
return self.workspace_dir / "exports"
def get_exports_file_path(self, filename):
return self.workspace_dir / "exports" / filename # "exports" repeated
✅ DRY Version:
def get_exports_dir(self):
return self.workspace_dir / "exports"
def get_exports_file_path(self, filename):
return self.get_exports_dir() / filename
Now "exports"
only lives in one place. If you change the folder name, you change it in one method — that's DRY.
✅ Your Plan, DRY + Explicit:
The hybrid approach you’re going with supports DRY without sacrificing:
-
Searchable, explicit method names (
get_exports_dir()
) -
Flexible path resolution (
get_path("exports/aggregate")
) -
Declarative scaffolding (
scaffold.json
or class dict)
Next Step?
If you're ready, I can now:
-
Draft a basic
scaffold.json
representing your current workspace layout -
Implement a hybrid
WorkspaceManager
class:-
A few key
get_*()
methods that useget_path()
-
A
get_path(key: str)
fallback method -
check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold()
using the scaffold definition
-
Sound good?
Clayton 19:
yes, give me all of this:
- Draft a basic scaffold.json representing your current workspace layout
- Implement a hybrid WorkspaceManager class:
- A few key get_*() methods that use get_path()
- A get_path(key: str) fallback method
- check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold() using the scaffold definition
ChatGPT 19:
Done — here's what I've created for you:
✅ scaffold.json
A declarative file describing your workspace layout (folders and key files).
✅ WorkspaceManager
(hybrid class)
-
Loads
scaffold.json
-
Exposes:
-
get_path(key: str)
— for dynamic access -
Explicit helpers:
get_exports_dir()
,get_queries_file()
, etc. -
check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold()
— builds the structure from scaffold
-
👇 Example Usage:
bash
CopyEdit
poetry run python src/my_software_name/workspace_manager.py
This will:
-
Load the scaffold
-
Ensure all folders/files exist in
workspaces/workspace0
-
Print resolved paths to key directories
Would you like:
-
A CLI wrapper around this? (
wsmx init workspace0
, etc.) -
Validation logic to check for missing/extra files?
-
Scaffold profiles (e.g.
minimal
,full
)?
Let me know how you'd like to extend it next.
// scaffold.json (to be placed in your root or config directory)
{
"": ["config", "data", "imports", "exports", "scripts", "secrets", "queries"],
"exports": ["aggregate"],
"config": ["default-workspace.toml"],
"secrets": ["secrets.yaml", "secrets-example.yaml"],
"queries": ["default-queries.toml"]
}
# workspace_manager.py (hybrid design)
import json
import logging
from pathlib import Path
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO, format="%(levelname)s: %(message)s")
class WorkspaceManager:
ROOT_DIR = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2] # src/my_software_name/
WORKSPACES_DIR_NAME = "workspaces"
SCAFFOLD_FILE = ROOT_DIR / "scaffold.json"
def __init__(self, workspace_name: str):
self.workspace_name = workspace_name
self.workspace_dir = self.get_workspaces_dir() / workspace_name
self.scaffold = self.load_scaffold()
def load_scaffold(self) -> dict:
if not self.SCAFFOLD_FILE.exists():
raise FileNotFoundError(f"Missing scaffold file: {self.SCAFFOLD_FILE}")
with open(self.SCAFFOLD_FILE, "r") as f:
return json.load(f)
def get_workspaces_dir(self) -> Path:
return self.ROOT_DIR / self.WORKSPACES_DIR_NAME
def get_path(self, key: str) -> Path:
"""
Generic path getter using slash-separated key
Example: get_path("exports/aggregate")
"""
path = self.workspace_dir
for part in key.strip("/").split("/"):
path /= part
return path
def get_exports_dir(self):
return self.get_path("exports")
def get_queries_file(self):
return self.get_path("queries/default-queries.toml")
def get_config_file(self):
return self.get_path("config/default-workspace.toml")
def check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold(self):
for parent, children in self.scaffold.items():
base = self.workspace_dir / parent
for child in children:
path = base / child
if "." in child:
if not path.exists():
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
path.touch()
logging.info(f"Created file: {path}")
else:
if not path.exists():
path.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
logging.info(f"Created folder: {path}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
wm = WorkspaceManager("workspace0")
wm.check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold()
print("Exports dir:", wm.get_exports_dir())
print("Default queries file:", wm.get_queries_file())
Clayton 20:
sure, hit me with that wsmx init workspace
ChatGPT 20:
Great! Here's a minimal but production-ready CLI tool wsmx
using typer
that supports:
wsmx init <workspace_name>
This command:
-
Creates the workspace under
workspaces/<workspace_name>/
-
Loads
scaffold.json
-
Creates folders and files via
WorkspaceManager
📁 Project structure recap
my-software/
├── workspaces/
│ └── <workspace_name>/...
├── scaffold.json
├── src/
│ └── my_software_name/
│ └── workspace_manager.py
└── cli/
└── wsmx.py <-- CLI entrypoint
🖥️ cli/wsmx.py
import typer
from pathlib import Path
from my_software_name.workspace_manager import WorkspaceManager
app = typer.Typer()
@app.command()
def init(name: str):
"""
Initialize a new workspace and create folders/files from scaffold.json
"""
wm = WorkspaceManager(name)
wm.check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold()
typer.echo(f"✅ Workspace '{name}' initialized at {wm.workspace_dir}")
@app.command()
def info(name: str):
"""
Print key paths for the given workspace
"""
wm = WorkspaceManager(name)
typer.echo(f"📁 Workspace: {wm.workspace_dir}")
typer.echo(f"📂 Exports dir: {wm.get_exports_dir()}")
typer.echo(f"📄 Queries file: {wm.get_queries_file()}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
app()
📦 Setup in pyproject.toml
To make this pipx-installable:
[tool.poetry.scripts]
wsmx = "cli.wsmx:app"
Then you can do:
poetry build
pipx install dist/<your_package>.whl
wsmx init workspace0
✅ Example usage
# From your project root
poetry run python cli/wsmx.py init workspace0
poetry run python cli/wsmx.py info workspace0
Would you like to add list
, delete
, or validate
commands next? Or generate a default default-workspace.toml
file on init
?
Clayton 21:
is including the cli directory necessary for every software i build? i could go either way on it? does this stuff actually leverage cookiecutter? not that it needs to. I think we are close to success and i like that the scaffold.json file is in route. The only other place for it might be in the workspaces dir
ChatGPT 21:
Great reflections — you’re asking the right questions as you finalize the foundation of your stack. Let’s hit each point:
🧱 1. Do I need a cli/
directory for every software I build?
Short answer: No, it’s not required — it's a matter of organization preference.
🔀 Your options:
Style | Where CLI lives | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|
cli/wsmx.py (current) |
Separate from src/ |
Keeps CLI logic cleanly decoupled from library logic | Slightly more boilerplate; not colocated |
src/my_software_name/cli.py |
Inside the package | Keeps everything together; convenient for small tools | Less separation of concerns |
__main__.py inside package |
Directly runnable via python -m my_software_name |
Idiomatic Python entrypoint; works well with Poetry | Can get crowded with logic over time |
bin/ folder (advanced) |
Scripts only | Unix-style separation | Rarely used in Python ecosystems |
✅ Recommendation:
For shared tools like wsmx
, keeping it in a dedicated CLI module or cli/
folder is clean and maintainable — but for small scripts or apps, embedding it in src/
is totally fine.
🧰 2. Are we actually using Cookiecutter?
No — not in this current setup.
We’ve replaced Cookiecutter with:
-
scaffold.json
(declarative scaffold) -
WorkspaceManager.check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold()
(imperative logic)
❓Should you use Cookiecutter here?
Not necessarily. You only need Cookiecutter if you want:
-
Rich templating (e.g., Jinja2 in filenames or file contents)
-
Prompting the user for values at init time
-
Rendering dynamic variables into files
Your current use case is directory-oriented, not template-driven — so this simpler approach is solid.
That said, you could easily bolt on Cookiecutter in the future if a workspace needs templated config, docstring headers, or README files.
📁 3. Where should scaffold.json
live?
Options:
Location | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Root (my-software/scaffold.json ) |
Clear, central, shared across workspaces | Slight coupling to file layout |
Inside workspaces/ |
Closer to context | Slightly harder to find for tooling/scripts |
Inside src/my_software_name/ |
Bundles it with code (good for packaging) | Can feel “hidden” or too code-coupled |
✅ Recommendation:
Stick with root directory for now. It’s visible, shared, and easily editable. If you want to support multiple scaffold variants, you could do:
/scaffolds/
├── default.json
├── minimal.json
└── full.json
and add a CLI flag like:
wsmx init workspace0 --scaffold scaffolds/minimal.json
🧠 Summary
Topic | Recommendation |
---|---|
CLI folder | Use it for shared tools like wsmx ; not required per app |
Cookiecutter | Not needed here; could be added later if you need file templating |
scaffold.json location |
Keep it at project root for now |
Let me know if you’d like me to update WorkspaceManager
to support custom --scaffold
paths or profiles! You're very close to a reusable toolchain.
Clayton 22:
I agree abou the scaffold file or folder living in root
if the cli tool needs to be carried onboard (which there are arguments for, like evangelism, native embedded distribution, standardization) - it makes sense that the cli folder be in root. But if it is a pipx tool, cannot it be used as a separate utility, with no need to be packaged onboard?
ChatGPT 22:
Exactly — you’ve nailed the distinction.
CLI Folder in the Project Root vs. CLI as a Separate pipx Utility
1. CLI folder in project root:
-
Pros:
-
CLI code lives alongside your software — easy to keep in sync.
-
Easier for new contributors to see all pieces at once.
-
Good if CLI commands are very tightly coupled to project internals.
-
Enables customized CLI tooling per project.
-
-
Cons:
-
CLI is tied to that codebase and version.
-
Users must clone or install entire project to run CLI.
-
Updates require updating project codebase.
-
2. CLI as a separate pipx-installed utility:
-
Pros:
-
CLI is decoupled from any single project — can manage many projects or workspaces.
-
Can be installed globally or per-user once, usable anywhere.
-
Updates to CLI do not require updating every project.
-
Ideal for evangelism or standardization — single tool everyone uses.
-
Can be developed and released independently.
-
-
Cons:
-
Requires users to install and manage separate tool.
-
CLI must be designed generically, or with project-agnostic defaults.
-
Needs to handle varying project layouts flexibly.
-
Summary Table
Aspect | CLI in Root Folder | CLI as Separate pipx Utility |
---|---|---|
Deployment | Bundled with project | Installed independently (pipx) |
Maintenance | Versioned with project | Independent release cycle |
Coupling | Tight to project specifics | Generic, flexible |
User onboarding | Clone project to run CLI | Install CLI once, use everywhere |
Use cases | Project-specific commands | Cross-project workspace manager |
Practical advice:
-
If you want a standardized CLI tool across many projects, pipx is excellent. Users install
wsmx
once, run it everywhere. -
If your CLI commands are highly project-specific, bundle CLI inside the project for convenience.
-
You can even do both: ship a generic
wsmx
via pipx, but allow projects to add extra CLI commands by importing plugins or extensions.
Want me to help you:
-
Build a standalone
wsmx
CLI package for pipx? -
Write docs on how to install/use
wsmx
globally vs per-project? -
Design a plugin system for project-specific CLI extensions?
Clayton 23:
ah, so if i always plan to use workspacemanager.py, it makes sense to always ship cli/wsmx. The functionality should be the same whether it is internal or external, based on pythonic nesting structure.
I am trying to build a cross-project workspace manager (though not necessarily inter-project).
so, running onboard could be good for testing and evangelism. but to do this i think i would want to git clone a the cli directory into the root of whatever sofware i am building, to ensure i am getting the latest version. even then, pip sounds a lot easier for centralization.
ChatGPT 23:
Exactly — you’ve captured the tradeoffs perfectly.
Key takeaways for your cross-project WorkspaceManager & CLI design:
1. Ship CLI inside projects for onboarding and evangelism
-
Drop a fresh
cli/wsmx/
folder into project roots for easy local use & testing. -
Keeps CLI tightly synced with the exact version of the WorkspaceManager library in that project.
-
Ideal for demos, early adopters, or environments without pipx/pypi access.
2. Publish CLI as a pipx-installable package for real-world scale
-
One install, many projects:
pipx install wsmx
-
Centralized updates and distribution, easier for users.
-
CLI just imports the WorkspaceManager package as a dependency.
-
Less friction for wider adoption beyond your immediate team.
How the two approaches can coexist:
-
Use the pipx CLI as your primary, standardized interface.
-
For project-specific forks or experimental features, clone
cli/wsmx
locally. -
Keep CLI code as clean and stable as possible to avoid version mismatch confusion.
-
Optionally, your CLI can support a
--project-root
or--workspace-root
argument so it can be pointed anywhere.
Python packaging note
Because Python imports are hierarchical, if your cli/wsmx
is structured well:
my-software/
├── cli/
│ └── wsmx.py
├── src/
│ └── my_software_name/
│ └── workspacemanager.py
Then CLI can do:
from my_software_name.workspacemanager import WorkspaceManager
and it will work the same whether run inside the project or via pipx-installed CLI, as long as:
-
Your
PYTHONPATH
includes thesrc/
directory when running locally, or -
The package is properly installed (editable install or build+install) in the environment.
If you want, I can help you:
-
Write a README that describes both usage styles clearly
-
Setup a minimal editable install workflow so
pipx
and local dev don’t conflict -
Design CLI args for multi-workspace / multi-project usage scenarios
Let me know!
Clayton 24:
cli is interesting as a directory name because it inferes a collection of other tools
you're saying that wsmx can be accomplished in a single python file
show me your wsmx.py file and explain how it can be converting in to a pipx tool
ChatGPT 24:
Absolutely! Let's break this down clearly.
1. Why cli/
as a directory?
-
It implies a collection of CLI tools or commands, e.g.,
-
cli/wsmx.py
— your workspace manager CLI -
cli/other_tool.py
— another command-line utility
-
-
Useful for larger projects or tools with multiple related commands.
-
Helps organize code, tests, docs, etc.
But if you only have one CLI tool (wsmx
), a single file is perfectly fine.
2. Single-file wsmx.py
example
Here's a simple CLI using Typer (a popular modern CLI framework):
# wsmx.py
import typer
from pathlib import Path
from my_software_name.workspace_manager import WorkspaceManager
app = typer.Typer(help="Workspace Manager CLI (wsmx)")
@app.command()
def init(name: str):
"""
Initialize a new workspace with the scaffolded structure.
"""
wm = WorkspaceManager(name)
wm.check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold()
typer.echo(f"✅ Workspace '{name}' initialized at {wm.workspace_dir}")
@app.command()
def info(name: str):
"""
Show info about a workspace.
"""
wm = WorkspaceManager(name)
typer.echo(f"Workspace directory: {wm.workspace_dir}")
typer.echo(f"Exports directory: {wm.get_exports_dir()}")
typer.echo(f"Queries file: {wm.get_queries_file()}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
app()
3. How to convert wsmx.py
into a pipx-installable tool
Step 1: Package your project with Poetry (or setuptools)
In your pyproject.toml
, add:
[tool.poetry.scripts]
wsmx = "cli.wsmx:app"
If your wsmx.py
lives in the cli/
folder inside your project root, the import path cli.wsmx
is valid.
Step 2: Build and publish your package
-
Build your package locally:
poetry build
-
Install your package with pipx:
pipx install dist/your_package_name-version.whl
This installs the CLI tool globally (or user-wide) on your machine.
Step 3: Run wsmx
from anywhere
wsmx init workspace0
wsmx info workspace0
4. How pipx knows what to run
Because in pyproject.toml
you declared:
wsmx = "cli.wsmx:app"
pipx creates an executable command called wsmx
that invokes the app
object in the cli.wsmx
module (which is a Typer app).
5. Summary
Concept | Explanation |
---|---|
Single wsmx.py file |
Defines CLI commands using Typer |
pyproject.toml scripts |
Connect CLI command name wsmx to Python callable |
pipx install |
Installs CLI tool globally for easy command-line use |
Execution | Runs CLI commands anywhere via the installed wsmx |
If you want, I can also help you write a minimal setup.py
or pyproject.toml
snippet and a full example repo structure for this. Just say the word!
Clayton 25:
i want to put a file "default-workspace.toml" in the workspaces/ dir to drive which of the workspaces will be used as the default.
# inside CLI init()
root_toml = wm.get_workspaces_dir() / "default-workspace.toml"
if not root_toml.exists():
root_toml.write_text(f'[default-workspace]\nworkspace = "{name}"\n')
and i can have the built up with the scaffold while i use wsmx?
hm. it should definitely be a part of wsmx to stand up a default project file
ChatGPT 25:
Exactly — you're thinking in exactly the right terms now.
✅ Yes: wsmx init
should definitely be responsible for creating default-workspace.toml
Here’s why:
-
It's the centralized config that lets your WorkspaceManager resolve the "active" workspace.
-
It doesn't belong inside an individual workspace — it's part of your workspace management system.
-
It’s the perfect job for
wsmx
, since that CLI is the workspace manager.
✅ Updated CLI init
logic with default file creation
Here’s how you would enhance your cli/wsmx.py
(or cli/__init__.py
if you're exposing it that way):
@app.command()
def init(name: str, set_default: bool = True):
"""
Initialize a new workspace and optionally make it the default.
"""
wm = WorkspaceManager(name)
wm.check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold()
# Optionally write the default-workspace.toml in the root of `workspaces/`
if set_default:
root_toml = wm.get_workspaces_dir() / "default-workspace.toml"
if not root_toml.exists():
root_toml.write_text(f'[default-workspace]\nworkspace = "{name}"\n')
typer.echo(f"📝 Created default-workspace.toml pointing to '{name}'")
else:
typer.echo("ℹ️ default-workspace.toml already exists. Not overwriting.")
typer.echo(f"✅ Workspace '{name}' initialized at {wm.workspace_dir}")
💡 Result
Now wsmx init workspace0
will:
-
Create the workspace folder with the full scaffold.
-
Add a
default-workspace.toml
file (if one doesn’t already exist). -
Set that new workspace as the default.
You can also opt out with:
wsmx init workspace1 --set-default False
✅ Bonus: Add wsmx default
command to override it later
@app.command()
def default(name: str):
"""
Set the default workspace by updating default-workspace.toml
"""
root = WorkspaceManager.ROOT_DIR / WorkspaceManager.WORKSPACES_DIR_NAME
file = root / "default-workspace.toml"
file.write_text(f'[default-workspace]\nworkspace = "{name}"\n')
typer.echo(f"✅ Updated default-workspace.toml → {name}")
TL;DR
-
Yes, your
wsmx
CLI is the right place to stand up and managedefault-workspace.toml
. -
It should live in the root of
workspaces/
, not inside a workspace. -
CLI should handle this automatically during
init
, with optional override. -
Adding a
default
command completes the loop.
Let me know if you'd like a flag to allow overwriting an existing default-workspace.toml
too.
Clayton 26:
i feel like you are playing a bit fast and loose with the word root. i see where you are going, but root_toml is a bit of a misnomer.
ChatGPT 26:
You're absolutely right — and I appreciate your precision.
🔍 Clarifying "root" in this context
-
Project root: Top-level of the entire repository or project (e.g.,
my-software/
) -
Workspaces root: The folder that contains all the workspace directories (e.g.,
my-software/workspaces/
) -
Workspace root: An individual workspace directory (e.g.,
my-software/workspaces/workspace0/
)
🧠 Why root_toml
is a misnomer
In this line:
root_toml = wm.get_workspaces_dir() / "default-workspace.toml"
We’re creating a file at the workspaces root, not the overall project root.
So root_toml
suggests the project root, but it’s really:
default_workspace_file = wm.get_workspaces_dir() / "default-workspace.toml"
which is clearer and more accurate.
✅ Suggested rename for clarity
default_path = wm.get_workspaces_dir() / "default-workspace.toml"
Or even:
default_workspace_toml = wm.get_default_workspace_toml_path()
if you want a class method like:
@classmethod
def get_default_workspace_toml_path(cls):
return cls.ROOT_DIR / cls.WORKSPACES_DIR_NAME / "default-workspace.toml"
✅ Summary
Term | Meaning | Better variable name |
---|---|---|
Project root | Entire repo (e.g., my-software/ ) |
project_root |
Workspaces root | Folder holding all workspaces | workspaces_root |
Workspace root | A single workspace folder | workspace_dir , workspace_root |
File in workspaces/ | default-workspace.toml location |
default_workspace_file |
You’re totally justified calling this out — naming is where meaning lives in architecture like this. Want me to do a full pass renaming all the “root” references in WorkspaceManager
to reflect this properly?
Clayton 27:
okay great.
provide me with steps to have a successful pipx pacakge in the next eight minutes
ChatGPT 27:
You got it. Here's a zero-to-working pipx package checklist — assuming you already have your Python package structure and CLI tool (wsmx.py
) ready.
✅ 0. Prereqs (assumed ready)
-
You have a
pyproject.toml
(Poetry or PEP 621) -
Your CLI tool is callable (e.g.,
cli/wsmx.py
, using Typer or argparse) -
Your main logic lives in
src/my_software_name/
✅ 1. Define your CLI entry point
In pyproject.toml
, under [tool.poetry.scripts]
:
[tool.poetry.scripts]
wsmx = "cli.wsmx:app"
🔁 Replace
cli.wsmx
with the dotted import path to your Typer app (or function).
✅ 2. Ensure your project layout is correct
my-package/
├── pyproject.toml
├── src/
│ └── my_software_name/
│ └── workspace_manager.py
├── cli/
│ └── wsmx.py
In pyproject.toml
:
[tool.poetry]
name = "wsmx"
version = "0.1.0"
packages = [{ include = "my_software_name", from = "src" }]
[tool.poetry.dependencies]
python = ">=3.11"
typer = "^0.12.3"
[build-system]
requires = ["poetry-core"]
build-backend = "poetry.core.masonry.api"
✅ 3. Build the package
From your project root:
poetry build
This creates a .whl
and .tar.gz
file in dist/
.
✅ 4. Install locally with pipx
pipx install dist/wsmx-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
Adjust version number accordingly. You can tab-complete in
dist/
.
✅ 5. Run it!
wsmx --help
wsmx init workspace0
✅ 6. Test editable pipx install (optional, dev mode)
pipx install --editable .
Or reinstall after making changes:
pipx reinstall wsmx --editable .
✅ 7. [Optional] Upload to PyPI
If you're ready:
poetry config pypi-token.pypi your-token-here
poetry publish --build
Then users can install it via:
pipx install wsmx
⏱️ You're good — this whole process can be done in ~8 minutes
Let me know if you want me to verify your pyproject.toml
or build folder layout — happy to sanity check it live.
Clayton 28:
[tool.poetry]
name = "wsmx"
version = "0.1.0"
packages = [{ include = "my_software_name", from = "src" }]
[tool.poetry.dependencies]
python = ">=3.11"
typer = "^0.12.3"
[build-system]
requires = ["poetry-core"]
build-backend = "poetry.core.masonry.api"
i think you have misunderstood
the entire point is that we do not know my_sofware_name
wsmx can be its own repository separate from any software project, meant to be used as a tool to standup the workspacemanager and workspace direcotry template for any new software package
ChatGPT 28:
Ah — thank you for the clarification.
You're absolutely right. The entire point of wsmx
is that it’s a project-agnostic, standalone pipx tool — used across many unknown/unrelated software projects to scaffold a WorkspaceManager
setup and a standard workspaces/
layout.
✅ Here's the corrected plan
We are now building a standalone CLI utility project, named wsmx
, with:
-
No dependency on a specific
my_software_name
-
Its own internal
WorkspaceManager
class -
A
scaffold.json
template file -
CLI entrypoint (
wsmx.py
) that can initialize workspaces in any target directory
📁 Folder layout for wsmx
repo
wsmx/
├── pyproject.toml
├── src/
│ └── wsmx/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── workspace_manager.py
│ ├── scaffold.json
│ └── cli.py # <-- CLI entrypoint
✅ pyproject.toml
for a standalone CLI pipx tool
[tool.poetry]
name = "wsmx"
version = "0.1.0"
description = "Workspace Manager CLI for initializing standard workspace folders"
authors = ["Your Name <you@example.com>"]
packages = [{ include = "wsmx", from = "src" }]
[tool.poetry.dependencies]
python = ">=3.11"
typer = "^0.12.3"
toml = "^0.10.2"
[tool.poetry.scripts]
wsmx = "wsmx.cli:app"
[build-system]
requires = ["poetry-core"]
build-backend = "poetry.core.masonry.api"
✅ This
wsmx
package is now fully project-agnostic — it can be installed via pipx and used anywhere.
✅ Example CLI usage after install
wsmx init ./my-new-project
This would:
-
Copy
workspace_manager.py
intomy-new-project/src/
-
Create
my-new-project/workspaces/
-
Add a default workspace folder with scaffolded structure
-
Create
default-workspace.toml
inworkspaces/
✅ Now you can pipx it
# From the root of your wsmx repo
poetry build
# Install it with pipx
pipx install dist/wsmx-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
# Now you can run:
wsmx --help
wsmx init ./target-software
🔥 Boom: You now have a global workspace bootstrapping tool
This tool can:
-
Inject your canonical
workspace_manager.py
-
Add a scaffolded workspace directory tree
-
Generate
default-workspace.toml
-
Work across any Python repo without caring what it's called
Would you like me to generate the initial full src/wsmx/cli.py
+ workspace_manager.py
files now in that standalone pipx style?
Clayton 29:
woah. show me your workspace_manager.py code in this context. We might be off trail again.
ChatGPT 29:
Here's the revised version of workspace_manager.py
in the context of a standalone, project-agnostic wsmx
pipx utility:
📁 Key points:
-
It's not tied to any project structure
-
It accepts a base path (where your target repo lives)
-
It builds a
workspaces/
folder and default workspace inside that -
It uses a bundled
scaffold.json
stored alongside the code insrc/wsmx/
🔧 Example usage (after pipx install):
wsmx init ./my-software --name workspace0
This would:
-
Create
./my-software/workspaces/workspace0/
-
Scaffold the workspace layout
-
Write
default-workspace.toml
in./my-software/workspaces/
Let me know if you'd like a matching cli.py
to call this as a Typer app, or if you want to support additional options like --scaffold-path
or --no-default
.
Clayton 30:
alright. show me your cli.py file
i assume this is the main call that used to be in the workspace_manager.py file? or is that misled
ChatGPT 30:
Yes, you're right to link the CLI entry point (cli.py
) with the old __main__
logic — but in this case, cli.py
is your official Typer-based command-line interface. It imports and uses WorkspaceManager
, but lives independently so workspace_manager.py
stays reusable.
Here’s the cli.py
that corresponds to your current workspace_manager.py
:
# src/wsmx/cli.py
import typer
from pathlib import Path
from wsmx.workspace_manager import WorkspaceManager
app = typer.Typer(help="🛠️ Workspace Manager CLI for scaffolding project workspaces.")
@app.command()
def init(
target_dir: Path = typer.Argument(..., help="Path to the target project directory."),
name: str = typer.Option("default", "--name", "-n", help="Name of the workspace to create."),
set_default: bool = typer.Option(True, "--set-default/--no-set-default", help="Write default-workspace.toml")
):
"""
Initialize a new workspace inside the given target directory.
"""
wm = WorkspaceManager(target_dir, name)
wm.check_and_create_dirs_from_scaffold()
if set_default:
WorkspaceManager.create_default_workspace_toml(wm.base_path / "workspaces", name)
typer.echo(f"✅ Workspace '{name}' initialized at {wm.workspace_dir}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
app()
📦 Tie it into pipx with pyproject.toml
[tool.poetry.scripts]
wsmx = "wsmx.cli:app"
After building and installing with pipx, you'll be able to run:
wsmx init ./my-project --name experiment1
Let me know if you want to add commands like:
-
wsmx default set experiment1
-
wsmx list
-
wsmx scaffold dump
You’re now fully scaffolded for success 🚀
Clayton 31:
so if i have a bunch of software directories for various git cloned repos and projects, i am in my %user%Documents/dev folder. pipeline and xlims are examples of two pacakges i work on in my %user%/Documents/dev folder.
you're saying that i would call
wsmx init ./pipeline --name pipeline0
while in the dev directory?
ChatGPT 31:
Yes — you've got the setup exactly right.
If you're working out of C:\Users\YourName\Documents\dev
, and you have repos like:
plaintext
CopyEdit
C:\Users\YourName\Documents\dev\ ├── pipeline\ ├── xlims\ ├── ...
Then from inside dev/
, you would run:
bash
CopyEdit
wsmx init ./pipeline --name pipeline0
This will:
-
Create the directory:
pipeline/workspaces/pipeline0/
-
Populate it using
scaffold.json
(which lives in your pipx-installedwsmx
tool) -
Write a file:
pipeline/workspaces/default-workspace.toml
→ pointing topipeline0
🧠 Summary of Behavior
Command | Result |
---|---|
wsmx init ./pipeline --name pipeline0 |
Adds a new workspace under the pipeline project |
wsmx init ./xlims --name test2025 |
Adds a new workspace under xlims |
--set-default False |
Skips creating default-workspace.toml |
Omit --name |
Defaults to default as the workspace name |
Would you like an option to also copy workspace_manager.py
into pipeline/src/
at the same time? That would give you the complete drop-in for a new project in one shot.
Clayton 32:
what if i want to call wsmx from inside the pipeline root, to build a new workspace?
ChatGPT 32:
If you're calling wsmx
from inside the root of your project (like pipeline/
), and want it to scaffold a new workspace relative to the current directory, here’s how to do it cleanly:
✅ Minimal Command from Inside Project Root
cd pipeline/
wsmx init . --name workspace1
This will:
-
Treat the current directory (
.
) asbase_path
-
Build
workspaces/workspace1/
under it -
Create the appropriate folder structure from
scaffold.json
-
Optionally write
workspaces/default-workspace.toml
✅ Bonus: Default Behavior if No Path Given
To make this even cleaner, we can adjust cli.py
so if no path is provided, it defaults to the current directory:
@app.command()
def init(
target_dir: Path = typer.Argument(Path.cwd(), help="Target project root. Defaults to current directory."),
name: str = typer.Option("default", "--name", "-n", help="Name of the workspace to create."),
set_default: bool = typer.Option(True, "--set-default/--no-set-default", help="Write default-workspace.toml")
):
...
Then you could just run:
wsmx init --name workspace1
From inside pipeline/
, and it will Just Work™.
Would you like me to update the CLI to support that default behavior?
Clayton 33:
target_dir: Path = typer.Argument(Path.cwd(), help="Target project root. Defaults to current directory."),
will using this change the previous imementaiton?
ChatGPT 33:
Excellent question — and this is where Typer's behavior around default Argument
s matters.
🔍 Short Answer:
Yes, that line changes the behavior slightly — but in a good way for your use case.
📌 The Current Version (Before Change):
target_dir: Path = typer.Argument(..., help="Path to the target project directory.")
This makes the target_dir
argument required — so you must always explicitly run:
wsmx init ./pipeline --name workspace1
✅ The Proposed Version:
target_dir: Path = typer.Argument(Path.cwd(), help="Target project root. Defaults to current directory.")
This makes target_dir
optional.
You can now run:
wsmx init --name workspace1
From within your project folder (e.g., pipeline/
), and it will assume Path.cwd()
is the target base directory.
But you can still optionally do:
wsmx init ./other-repo --name experiment2
And it will still work exactly like before.
✅ TL;DR — Summary
Behavior | Required argument | Optional (with Path.cwd() default) |
---|---|---|
wsmx init ./path |
✅ Required | ✅ Works |
wsmx init (no path) |
❌ Fails | ✅ Works — uses current folder |
Makes previous usage fail? | ❌ No | ✅ Still supported |
Want me to update the cli.py
implementation for you to reflect this?
Clayton 34:
I changed the one line necessary provide a readme file and then let's get this thing on pipx
ChatGPT 34:
Here’s a concise README.md you can include in your standalone wsmx
repo to accompany your CLI pipx tool:
markdown
CopyEdit
# wsmx — Workspace Manager CLI `wsmx` is a lightweight, project-agnostic CLI tool to scaffold and manage workspace directories for any Python project. It bootstraps a standardized workspace folder structure and configuration files inside your project directory. --- ## Features - Initialize workspaces with a consistent scaffold defined by `scaffold.json` - Create a `default-workspace.toml` to track the active workspace - Works standalone and project-agnostic; no assumptions about your repo layout - Easily installable and runnable via `pipx` --- ## Installation ```bash pipx install wsmx
Or, install from source via Poetry:
bash
CopyEdit
git clone https://github.com/yourusername/wsmx.git cd wsmx poetry install poetry build pipx install dist/wsmx-0.1.0-py3-none-any.whl
Usage
Run from inside your project root (or specify a path):
bash
CopyEdit
# Initialize a workspace named 'default' in the current directory wsmx init # Initialize a workspace named 'workspace1' in ./myproject wsmx init ./myproject --name workspace1 # Skip creating default-workspace.toml wsmx init ./myproject --name workspace1 --no-set-default
Project Layout After Initialization
arduino
CopyEdit
myproject/ └── workspaces/ ├── workspace1/ │ ├── config/ │ ├── data/ │ ├── imports/ │ ├── exports/ │ ├── scripts/ │ ├── secrets/ │ └── queries/ └── default-workspace.toml
Contributing
Contributions welcome! Please open issues or PRs on GitHub.
License
MIT License
Clayton 35:
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\pipeline> cd ..
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev> cd .\wsmx
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\wsmx> pipx uninstall wsmx
uninstalled wsmx! ✨ 🌟 ✨
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\wsmx> poetry build
Building wsmx (0.1.1)
Building sdist
- Building sdist
- Built wsmx-0.1.1.tar.gz
Building wheel - Building wheel
- Built wsmx-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\wsmx> pipx install dist/wsmx-0.1.1-py3-none-any.whl
installed package wsmx 0.1.1, installed using Python 3.11.9
These apps are now globally available- wsmx.exe
done! ✨ 🌟 ✨
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\wsmx> cd ..\pipeline
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\pipeline> wsmx init --name workspace1
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\wsmx> cd ..\wsmx
PS C:\Users\george.bennett\OneDrive - City of Memphis\Documents\dev\wsmx> twine upload dist/*
- wsmx.exe
pypi token setup
## Using this token
To use this API token:
- Set your username to `__token__`
- Set your password to the token value, including the `pypi-` prefix
For example, if you are using [Twine](https://pypi.org/project/twine/) to upload your projects to PyPI, set up your `$HOME/.pypirc` file like this:
[testpypi]
username = __token__
password = pypi-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
[pypi]
username = __token__
password = pypi-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY