github workflows management
Date: 2025 07-July 07
Clayton 0
what is a normal strategy for managing the github workflows file?
Chat GPT 0
Great question. Managing the .github/workflows/
directory is an important part of modern DevOps for Python/CLI projects β especially with automation like CI, testing, linting, PyPI deploys, etc.
Hereβs how most teams handle it, and what might make sense for you with mulch
.
π§± Normal Strategy for Managing .github/workflows
β 1. Track It in Git and Push It to GitHub
This is the most common approach.
-
Workflows live in the repo at
.github/workflows/*.yml
-
Changes are tracked with Git like any other file
-
Commits to workflows are reviewed just like code
-
GitHub automatically picks them up on push to
main
,dev
, etc.
π Common Workflow:
-
Create a new workflow
.yml
file -
Test on a
dev
branch -
Merge to
main
-
GitHub runs it automatically
Example files:
.github/workflows/
βββ ci.yml # tests, linters, coverage
βββ release.yml # builds, tags, deploys
βββ docs.yml # optional GH Pages build
β οΈ 2. Avoid Tracking Workflows (Uncommon)
You're currently doing something unusual: holding .github/workflows/
locally without tracking it in Git. This is fine for personal experimentation or if workflows are managed elsewhere (e.g. through a shared corporate template system or secrets policy), but:
-
It breaks GitHub Actions integration unless files are actually in the repo
-
Teammates (or automation) wonβt see them
-
Risk of inconsistency and drift
-
Requires extra Git config (like
--assume-unchanged
or.gitignore
hacks)
π This is generally discouraged unless you have a very specific reason to do it.
β Recommended Strategy for You
Since mulch
is a CLI tool under active development, and you're managing releases with care:
βοΈ Track .github/workflows/
in Git
- Create a simple CI pipeline, e.g.
.github/workflows/ci.yml
:
name: CI
on:
push:
branches: [main, dev]
pull_request:
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Set up Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: '3.11'
- name: Install Poetry
run: pip install poetry
- name: Install dependencies
run: poetry install
- name: Run tests
run: poetry run pytest
- Track it normally in Git:
git add .github/workflows/ci.yml
git commit -m "Add CI workflow"
git push
-
Optionally:
-
Add
release.yml
to automate publishing to PyPI ontag
orpush
-
Add
test.yml
for multi-platform builds or linting
-
π§ͺ Optional: Use a Template/Scaffold Tool
If you want to avoid copy-pasting workflow files across projects, use:
-
cookiecutter
for project bootstrapping -
Or include your workflows in
mulch
scaffolding:{ ".github/workflows/ci.yml": "template content here" }
You could even build a mulch init --github-actions
flag that installs your standard GitHub Actions suite automatically.
π Summary
Strategy | Recommended? | Notes |
---|---|---|
Track .github/workflows/ in Git |
β Yes | Most common, clean, visible to GitHub |
Keep workflows local only | β No | Fragile, invisible to GitHub, bad for teams |
Use templating (mulch , etc.) |
β Optional | Great for reusability |
Let me know if you want help writing a ci.yml
for poetry
, or automating PyPI releases using GitHub Actions.